Citizen Resilience & Support Portal

A self-initiated concept created for learning purposes.

Reimagining Singapore’s digital services through a web-based, AI-assisted portal that guides citizens through post-death administrative tasks with calmness, clarity, and reduced cognitive load.

Link to prototype:

Flow 4 | https://www.figma.com/proto/Z6XMcox3uWl8CdKyS5KzIu/Govt-Portal?node-id=29-691&t=4iNAJMziBtv2BhgU-1&scaling=scale-down&content-scaling=fixed&page-id=0%3A1&starting-point-node-id=29%3A691

The Product

The Citizen Resilience & Support Portal streamlines post-death administrative tasks into one guided, AI-assisted journey. It provides clear next steps, secure data retrieval, and calm, task-focused guidance. The experience reduces cognitive load, improves cross-agency clarity, and supports citizens in completing essential actions with confidence.

Focus Areas

Content Design & Microcopy, Information Architecture, Cognitive Load Reduction, Civic Service Design, Interaction Design, Emotional Design, AI Experience Design

Role

Sole UX/UI Designer (end-to-end product thinking, UX strategy, content design, wireframing, UX writing, interaction design, prototyping)

Project Duration

5 days

When someone passes away, families are required to complete a large number of administrative tasks across multiple agencies (e.g. CPF, HDB, banks, insurer) within a short amount of time. These tasks often happen during grief or shock, and simple tasks can feel overwhelming. In Singapore, most services exist, but they live on separate sites, in separate forms, with separate deadlines.

This concept explores how a single guided portal, supported by Singpass, MyInfo and a restrained AI co-pilot, could make the emotionally heavy process more manageable, easier to follow, and less stressful to complete. 

This case focuses on UX writing, information architecture, content clarity, interaction design and design for sensitive contexts.

context & intent

Bereavement creates a heavy emotional load. Administration creates a heavy cognitive load. Together they compound, often making straightforward tasks feel unmanageable.

Primary problem

User Problems

Families struggle because:

  • They don’t know what to do first

  • They are unsure with websites or agencies to visit

  • They don’t know what’s required

  • The journey spans many agencies

  • They are overwhelmed by fragmented information

  • They fear making mistakes in legal or financial paperwork

  • Paperwork competes with grief, logistics and family coordination.

Service Gaps

  • No consolidated post-death admin guidance

  • No personalised task ordering based on situation

  • No multi-agency progress tracking

  • Limited empathetic UX writing in administrative contexts

  • Low cognitive support tools (checklists, sequencing, autofill, time estimates)

Design Challenge

How might we make post-death administrative tasks feel less fragmented, less mentally taxing, more navigable and paceable?

If tasks are consolidated, sequenced, and explained with plain-language content and progressive guidance through an AI co-pilot, supported by secure autofill via Singpass/MyInfo, users will complete tasks more accurately and with less mental strain.

Hypothesis

AI assists with:

  • Sequencing tasks

  • Explaining requirements

  • Clarifying purpose

  • Filling forms using MyInfo data

  • Explaining steps in simple language

  • Recommending next steps

  • Giving time estimates and reminders

  • Giving progress reassurance

I chose a co-pilot model instead of full automation.

The choice of Ai

AI avoids:

  • Emotional counselling

  • Legal advice

  • Subjective opinions

  • Acting as a “warm friend”

Choosing a tone that is calm, respectful, neutral and task focused matches how many Singapore government services communicate and respect cultural boundaries around grief and administrative matters.

scope & boundaries

Prioritised:

  • Web-first

  • Secure data retrieval only

  • Task sequencing

  • Form clarity and auto-fill

  • Document checklists

  • Progress and save/return

  • Light personalisation

  • Reminders and scheduling

Intentionally excluded:

  • Mobile-first optimisation

  • Cross-agency automation

  • Multi-family collaboration

  • Human support escalation

  • Complex legal journeys

  • Insurance claims automation

  • Financial calculators for estate

  • Religious/ritual-related support

  1. Home

  2. Login (Singpass)

  3. Light Onboarding

  4. Personalised task overview

  5. Task category

  6. Task detail

  7. AI guidance

  8. Form input and auto-fill

  9. Progress marker

  10. Next steps

  11. Document checklist and task scheduler

  12. Save + return later

Proposed journey

Instead of asking users to decide where to begin, the system recommends a starting point.

design Decisions

High-fidelity prototype

Lightweight, calming UI: Neutral colours and generous whitespace.

Log in: Singpass verification

Multilingual

Light onboarding: Personlise without interrogation, essential questions only.

Neutral, empathetic plain-language microcopy.

AI Resilience Assistant: Uses a neutral, grounded tone focused on task completion and avoids over-interjecting to maintain user autonomy.

Give clear plan of action.

Reduced decision points: Essential tasks are prioritised clearly.

Task block cards instead of long pages: Chunked steps reduce cognitive load and lets users to tackle one thing at a time.

Security is emphasised and reiterated where needed.

Time estimates and purpose notes: Help citizens understand why each step matters.

Small explanations reduce anxiety around mistakes.

Progressive disclosure: Keep screens visually calm by revealing details only when needed.

Forms are where cognitive load spikes. Auto-fill reduces recall and speeds accuracy.

AI-assisted form filling: MyInfo auto-fill

Information is retrieved and auto-filled where applicable.

AI-assisted form filling: Confirmation prompts for users to verify details.

Progress marker: A green check mark appears for sections that are fully completed

Document previews: Hovering over a section highlights the documents potentially required.

Document checklist and task scheduler: Helps users stay organised and prepared.

Drop-down selections for scheduling: Reduces cognitive load by allowing users to select pre-defined tasks and agencies.

Task confirmation card: Newly added tasks appear in a concise card format.

Toast notifications: Inform users of upcoming tasks.

Support realistic pacing: people rarely finish everything in one sitting.

Logout experience: The AI reassures that progress has been saved and users can return at any time.

This lens guided most decisions:

  • chunking instead of paragraphs

  • sequencing instead of free browsing

  • pause/return instead of forced completion

  • purpose notes instead of technical labels

  • auto-fill instead of user recall

  • neutral tone instead of emotional warmth

  • checklists instead of memory

This transfers well to healthcare, insurance, safety and civic services.

Cognitive Load Reduction

Trade-offs & Content Strategy Decisions

Warm vs neutral tone → neutral
Progressive sequencing vs full overview → progressive sequencing
Automation vs co-pilot → co-pilot
Mobile vs web → web
Single user vs collaboration → chose single user for now

These choices kept the product feasible and emotionally appropriate.

To move beyond concept, I’d validate:

  • readability under stress

  • sequencing clarity

  • tone safety

  • form fatigue

  • pause vs complete behaviours

  • missing tasks for edge cases

Qualitative signals of success:

  • “I know what to do next.”

  • “I’m not scared of making mistakes.”

  • “I can stop and continue later.”

  • “This feels manageable.”

future work & testing

Final Screens

Reflections

I learned how critical cognitive load reduction is when designing for stressful contexts. The challenge was balancing minimal information with the need for completeness across legal, financial and documentation tasks.

I demonstrated:

  • Structured problem framing

  • Information architecture

  • Cognitive load thinking

  • UX writing and tone

  • Designing for senstive contexts

  • Ensuring AI supports rather than overwhelms

  • Structuring cross-agency flows in a way that feels coherent to users

While conceptual, the design demonstrated how small UX writing and IA decision can improve experiences during emotionally heavy life events.

This project also clarified that I enjoy content strategy, interaction design, and systems thinking slightly more than heavy UI component work.

Design, to me, is not just about interfaces. It’s about helping people do hard things with dignity and clarity.

future expansion

  • If feasibility and policy align, the next version could explore:

  • Multi-family collaboration

  • Mobile adaptation

  • More life events (divorce, illness, etc.)

Next
Next

Banking App Verification Flow • Balancing UX, Security & Compliance